junctionasebo.blogg.se

Linux mint vs elementary os
Linux mint vs elementary os










linux mint vs elementary os
  1. #Linux mint vs elementary os software
  2. #Linux mint vs elementary os code

Flexible Heredoc & Nowdoc Syntaxes - Two key methods for defining strings within PHP.Detailed documentation that has everything you need!.If you a developer considering PHP 7.3+ for your project, it would be good to note the following benefits.

linux mint vs elementary os

After the introduction of PHP 7, the WordPress development process became more stable and reliable than before.

  • Great documentation that is easy to read and follow.Īs for PHP, we always thrive to use PHP 7.3+.
  • The high number of plugins as well that are available for WordPress allows any user to customize it depending on his/her needs.įor development, HTML5 with Sass is our go-to choice when building our themes. It is easy to learn and has a great community behind it. WordPress became a very popular choice when it comes to content management systems and building websites. Manjaro is a great desktop operating system for all range of tasks while Debian is a solid choice for servers.

    linux mint vs elementary os

    We run Manjaro and Debian operating systems in our office.

    #Linux mint vs elementary os code

    When writing our codes, we use Sublime Text and Visual Studio Code depending on the project. See moreĪt, we use HTML5, CSS 3, Sass, Vanilla.JS and PHP when building our premium WordPress themes and plugins. But it's also the case that most bugs I experience when using Ubuntu are Ubuntu-specific issues, especially on servers (in part because Ubuntu has a bunch of "cloud management" stuff pre-installed that is definitely a regression if you're not using Canonical's cloud management products). Ubuntu has better integration of non-free drivers, which may be important if you have hardware that requires them. I wouldn't recommend them to anyone not actively participating in Ubuntu the development community). (While Ubuntu in theory releases every 6 months, their non-LTS releases are effectively betas: They're often unstable, only have 9 months of support, etc. The experience with Ubuntu and Debian stable releases is pretty similar: A solid release every 2 years that's supported for a few years. I think everyone has seen the better experience using Ubuntu in the shift of prevalence from RHEL to Ubuntu in what most new companies are deploying on their servers, and I expect that trend to continue as long as Red Hat is using the RPM system (and I don't really see them as having a path to migrate).

    #Linux mint vs elementary os software

    I haven't dealt with RPM in the last couple years, but every experience I've had with RPM is that the RPM tools are slower, have less useful options, and it's more work to package software for them (and one makes more compromises in doing so). This is large part due to a huge amount of investment into tools like debhelper/dh over the years by the Debian community. We use Debian and its derivative Ubuntu because the apt ecosystem and toolchain for Debian packages is far superior to the yum-based system used by Fedora and RHEL.












    Linux mint vs elementary os